[Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example)

2024-03-07 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
Dear mailing list users, I have been trying to create an Option 17 with a specific structure for a vendor with the ID of 14810, where all I have is a sub-option 1, containing a string with an arbitrary FQDN. I have a working code for ISC DHCP, but I have not been able to locate a working example

Re: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example)

2024-03-08 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 3:42 AM Darren Ankney wrote: > Hi Marek, > > It is unclear to me. Is this for DHCPv6? > > Thank you, > Darren Ankney > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:51 PM Marek Hajduczenia > wrote: > > > > Dear mailing list users, > >

Re: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example)

2024-03-14 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
And confirmed, with the switch to 2.5.6, I can see two separate entries as expected. Thank you ! Marek -Original Message- From: Marek Hajduczenia Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 2:17 PM To: 'Kea user's list' Subject: RE: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example) Thanks, Darren

Re: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example)

2024-03-15 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
version and, as such, could contain bugs. 2.4.1 is the latest "stable" version. This version supports multiple option 17. Thank you, Darren Ankney On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 5:03 PM Marek Hajduczenia wrote: > > And confirmed, with the switch to 2.5.6, I can see two separate entrie

Re: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example)

2024-03-13 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
ren > Ankney > Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2024 3:25 PM > To: Kea user's list > Subject: Re: [Kea-users] KEA Option 17 structure (example) > > > > Hi Marek, > > > > That is my understanding. However, I've never tried any of the option 17 > setup. > > >

Re: [Kea-users] "ha_dedicated_ports" warning in Stork

2024-04-12 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
Thank you, Kevin - in the example you're referring to, do I still need to configure and run the control agent? I am a bit confounded as to what the specific change I need to do in my setup (dhcp config or control agent config) to make it click together Marek On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 6:31 PM Kevin

Re: [Kea-users] Converting an ISC IPv6 class definition to Kea syntax

2024-04-19 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
ex statements like ISC DHCP did. There was probably an additional line output that linked to some GL issue explaining. Something like this might work (I've not tested it): "client-classes": [ { "name": "rpd-1", "test": "substring(relay6[1].option[18

[Kea-users] Converting an ISC IPv6 class definition to Kea syntax

2024-04-19 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
Dear colleagues, I ran into a bit of a challenge with the conversion of the config from ISC to Kea, namely this little class definition gem: class "rpd-1" { match if v6relay( 1, option dhcp6.interface-id ) ~= "Md1:0/0.0$"; } What it does, as you can tell, it matches on the inner relay

Re: [Kea-users] DHCPv6, shared network, and double-relay Solicit messages

2024-04-23 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
So I think I found the potential solution, though I am not sure I understand why this happens. I had to specifically configure the unicast IPv6 address in the “interfaces” clause, as follows "interfaces-config": { "interfaces": [ "enp6s18/2600:6ce4:0:42::130" ] },

Re: [Kea-users] DHCPv6, shared network, and double-relay Solicit messages

2024-04-23 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
s for IPv4, but all the docs I have read indicate that it only binds to one address. On Apr 23, 2024 09:26, Marek Hajduczenia mailto:mxhajducze...@gmail.com> > wrote: _ WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links. _ So

Re: [Kea-users] DHCPv6, shared network, and double-relay Solicit messages

2024-04-24 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
quot;: { "interfaces": [ "eth1", "eth3", "*" ] }, "interfaces-config": { "interfaces": [ "enp0s2/2001:db8::1234:abcd" ] }, On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:04 PM Marek Hajduczenia mailto:mxhajducze...@gmail.com> > wro

Re: [Kea-users] Converting an ISC IPv6 class definition to Kea syntax

2024-04-27 Thread Marek Hajduczenia
it helps in some way? Thank you, Darren Ankney On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 8:51 AM Marek Hajduczenia wrote: > > Thank you, Darren, > > > > If these custom-defined options are outbound only, it would be great if that > was mentioned in the documentation somewhere. In all my read